<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:series="http://unfoldingneurons.com/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: In Defense Of Commenting</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.brandonsavage.net/in-defense-of-commenting/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.brandonsavage.net/in-defense-of-commenting/</link>
	<description>The personal blog of Brandon Savage. Contains entries of a personal and professional nature focusing on PHP, Apple, LAMP, MySQL and Washington, DC.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 29 Jul 2010 11:09:38 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brandon Savage</title>
		<link>http://www.brandonsavage.net/in-defense-of-commenting/#comment-484</link>
		<dc:creator>Brandon Savage</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 May 2009 11:22:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.brandonsavage.net/?p=389#comment-484</guid>
		<description>Whoops! My bad. No one else caught that! I&#039;ve added a 5th element. Thanks!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Whoops! My bad. No one else caught that! I&#8217;ve added a 5th element. Thanks!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cormac</title>
		<link>http://www.brandonsavage.net/in-defense-of-commenting/#comment-483</link>
		<dc:creator>Cormac</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 May 2009 09:23:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.brandonsavage.net/?p=389#comment-483</guid>
		<description>One of the most rational posts so far in this daft commenting debate. It&#039;s very easy to say &quot;your code should be self-commenting&quot; in the abstract, but what&#039;s ACTUALLY important is whether other programmers (including yourself) can properly understand what&#039;s what in a year&#039;s time.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One of the most rational posts so far in this daft commenting debate. It&#8217;s very easy to say &#8220;your code should be self-commenting&#8221; in the abstract, but what&#8217;s ACTUALLY important is whether other programmers (including yourself) can properly understand what&#8217;s what in a year&#8217;s time.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Daan Broekhof</title>
		<link>http://www.brandonsavage.net/in-defense-of-commenting/#comment-482</link>
		<dc:creator>Daan Broekhof</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 May 2009 08:17:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.brandonsavage.net/?p=389#comment-482</guid>
		<description>You should add a 
// Todo: Add 5th to things commenting is
there ;)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You should add a<br />
// Todo: Add 5th to things commenting is<br />
there ;)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk (feed is rejected)
Page Caching using apc (user agent is rejected)
Database Caching 44/51 queries in 0.040 seconds using disk
Content Delivery Network via Amazon Web Services: S3: files.brandonsavage.net.s3.amazonaws.com

Served from: www.brandonsavage.net @ 2010-07-31 10:50:55 -->