<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:series="http://unfoldingneurons.com/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Taking A Look At Propel 1.5</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.brandonsavage.net/taking-a-look-at-propel-1-5/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.brandonsavage.net/taking-a-look-at-propel-1-5/</link>
	<description>The personal blog of Brandon Savage. Contains entries of a personal and professional nature focusing on PHP, Apple, LAMP, MySQL and Washington, DC.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 03 Feb 2012 19:36:33 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jonathan Nieto</title>
		<link>http://www.brandonsavage.net/taking-a-look-at-propel-1-5/#comment-2971</link>
		<dc:creator>Jonathan Nieto</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Feb 2010 21:59:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.brandonsavage.net/?p=1176#comment-2971</guid>
		<description>When starting with symfony I started with Propel, too. Back that time it was the best choice because Doctrine was pretty unstable. But now Doctrine 1 is very stable. Based on all the features Doctrine has to offer I started to use it almost a year ago.

These two additions for Propel are already done in Doctrine, so my question is why not to start using doctrine. I really would like to know your reasons for using Propel.


Regards!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When starting with symfony I started with Propel, too. Back that time it was the best choice because Doctrine was pretty unstable. But now Doctrine 1 is very stable. Based on all the features Doctrine has to offer I started to use it almost a year ago.</p>
<p>These two additions for Propel are already done in Doctrine, so my question is why not to start using doctrine. I really would like to know your reasons for using Propel.</p>
<p>Regards!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brandon Savage</title>
		<link>http://www.brandonsavage.net/taking-a-look-at-propel-1-5/#comment-2967</link>
		<dc:creator>Brandon Savage</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Feb 2010 21:42:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.brandonsavage.net/?p=1176#comment-2967</guid>
		<description>According to the docs, these Query classes will eventually eliminate Peer classes, but don&#039;t do so yet. Peer classes will eventually become deprecated from what I understand. It&#039;s important to note, however, that Query classes extend Criteria objects; Peer classes extend BasePeer.

Propel did go stagnant for a while. The person who was responsible for Propel&#039;s development essentially moved on, and after a while named a successor, who has not been leading the charge to reinvigorate Propel.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>According to the docs, these Query classes will eventually eliminate Peer classes, but don&#8217;t do so yet. Peer classes will eventually become deprecated from what I understand. It&#8217;s important to note, however, that Query classes extend Criteria objects; Peer classes extend BasePeer.</p>
<p>Propel did go stagnant for a while. The person who was responsible for Propel&#8217;s development essentially moved on, and after a while named a successor, who has not been leading the charge to reinvigorate Propel.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jake Smith</title>
		<link>http://www.brandonsavage.net/taking-a-look-at-propel-1-5/#comment-2966</link>
		<dc:creator>Jake Smith</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Feb 2010 21:37:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.brandonsavage.net/?p=1176#comment-2966</guid>
		<description>Is Propel getting rid of the Peer classes?

The last time I used Propel was 2008, which I believe was 1.1 or 1.2.  I found writing queries in Propel to be much more tedious than doctrine.  I&#039;m glad Propel is making strides to improve.

Didn&#039;t Propel go stagnant for a while?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is Propel getting rid of the Peer classes?</p>
<p>The last time I used Propel was 2008, which I believe was 1.1 or 1.2.  I found writing queries in Propel to be much more tedious than doctrine.  I&#8217;m glad Propel is making strides to improve.</p>
<p>Didn&#8217;t Propel go stagnant for a while?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk: basic (Feed is rejected)
Page Caching using disk: enhanced (User agent is rejected)
Database Caching 4/11 queries in 0.004 seconds using disk: basic
Content Delivery Network via Amazon Web Services: S3: files.brandonsavage.net.s3.amazonaws.com

Served from: www.brandonsavage.net @ 2012-02-07 04:22:33 -->
